data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e87d4/e87d433b81099301bdf311ede19badea23446b88" alt=""
Though I missed the true beta period I downloaded and installed the pre-release version of FTK 2.1 last night. FTK 2.0 left us all in a state of shock. Many questions and accusations flew around various industry forums and mailing lists. Prices went up, quality went down, and we were wanting what we paid for. A lot of faith was lost in Accessdata and their ability to provide a solid product moving forward.
Don't throw away your dongles quite yet. 2.1 is the product 2.0 was supposed to be.
Compared to 2.0, the installation of 2.1 was a breeze. The only missing link was that I needed to reboot to get KFF installed.
Some remarkable improvements I noticed are:
Speed - moving between tabs is as it should be. Processing is much much faster.
Resource usage - Obviously with a 64bit install FTK will use as many resources as can be thrown at it. I like this. I have a good machine, with plenty of resources and before I moved to 64bit, I always watched in horror as my resources just didn't get used.
Here's a shot of FTK just beginning to process an image:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbf51/cbf51d334a03a65eaeef4c1b496aa1aa098e6366" alt=""
Here it is 10 minutes in to processing:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5da6/b5da6bc6fab3a95526384283e90ccd551339ef9b" alt=""
Usability - Wow, when you click on a tab, you open that tab immediately, even while processing a case.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/013fa/013faf8b5d8f03b007ecf9509ca4345a9ea9c9d5" alt=""
Does it still require a huge amount of resources? Why yes, yes it does. My test rig has the following specs:
8GB ECC 667 RAM
Dual Xeon 2.66GHz Quad Core processors
System drive is a raid-0 on two 146GB SAS drives
Database drive 3*500GB SATA raid-0
All in all I have to hand it to Accessdata. After all the tongue lashing they took when 2.0 was released, they listened to their customers, licked their wounds, and went back to the drawing board and worked to remedy the problems. I won't say just yet that all of the problems have been fixed. I just installed the product last night, and I'm still processing cases, but this is what I wanted to see - a solid product capable of living up to its marketing, and a product that gives me what I paid for.
Addendum: An 80GB disk took about 6 hours to process and index. I imagine if I had more disk available I could get it taken care of in under 4 hours. Compared to FTK 1.7 which took 20 hours to process an image, I'm happy, very happy with the performance. Currently, I'm processing two more images of 100GB and 150GB in the same case.